Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Brandon Holt vs Omar Jasika Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Holt vs Jasika analysis and find out who is favored!
Brandon Holt vs Omar Jasika Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Holt has won 51.75% of points on his second serve, while Jasika has won 53.17%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Holt, in recent form, has won 50.15% of his opponent's second serve points, while Jasika has won 51.72%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.99% and 30.16% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Holt has saved 59.04% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jasika has saved 59.07% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Holt has won 55.56% of matches played (W/L 30/ 24), with Jasika winning 63.64% (W/L 49/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Holt has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 138/ 80), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2). Jasika has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 209/ 117), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 20% (W/L 2/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Holt has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 59.38% of matches (W/L 19/ 13), where as Jasika has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 51.16% of matches (W/L 22/ 21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Holt has played against opponents with an average rank of 316.37 while Jasika has played against players with an average rank of 229.68.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Holt has won 64% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jasika has won 71% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Holt has converted 41.77% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jasika has converted 44.06% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Holt 0 - 0 Jasika
262
Rank
180
High
26
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
204
Rank
204
High
26
Age
L
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
Form
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
61% (157-99)
Career Total W/L
62% (256-155)
63% (22-13)
YTD W/L
60% (18-12)
$364,930
Career Prize Money
$196,305
1
YTD Titles
2
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Brandon Holt | Omar Jasika |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 63% (22/13) | 60% (18/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 62% (48/30) | 54% (35/30) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (394/345) | 51% (314/306) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 66% (21/11) | 65% (17/9) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 25% (1/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.34 | 0.19 |
| Aces Total | 123 | 59 |
| DFs per game | 0.07 | 0.19 |
| DFs Total | 26 | 59 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:36:39 | 1:31:50 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 288.4 | 247.9 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (1508/2310) | 68% (1301/1921) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (1044/1508) | 66% (859/1301) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (415/802) | 53% (331/620) |
| BPs Won% Total | 42% (104/249) | 42% (68/163) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (980/2413) | 38% (709/1857) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 75% (3/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 38% (3/5) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 63% (12/7) | 47% (8/9) |
| Futures W/L | 88% (7/1) | 88% (7/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (22/33) | 61% (17/28) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (6/8) | 60% (6/10) |
| Deciding Set W% | 60% (6/10) | 83% (5/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 96% (23/22) | 94% (16/15) |
| 1st set W, L | 4% (23/1) | 6% (16/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (12/0) | 15% (13/2) |
Brandon Holt Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Brandon Holt
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve %
76%
(
41 of
54)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Philip Sekulic
Player
Brandon Holt
56%
(
54 of
96)
1st Serve %
53%
(
58 of
110)
2
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
4
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
38 of
58)
55%
(
23 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
42%
(
40 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
48 of
110)
104
Total Points Won
102
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Holt
Player
Arthur Fery
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
49%
(
41 of
84)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
84)
80
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yu Hsiou Hsu
Player
Brandon Holt
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Holt
Player
Max Purcell
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
48%
(
30 of
62)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Patrick Kypson
Player
Brandon Holt
44%
(
8 of
18)
1st Serve %
87%
(
13 of
15)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
75%
(
6 of
8)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
20
Total Points Won
13
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Brandon Holt
Player
Martin Damm
63%
(
64 of
102)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
91)
9
Aces
13
0
Double Faults
7
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
39 of
54)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
39%
(
40 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
91)
98
Total Points Won
95
|
7-5 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nishesh Basavareddy
Player
Brandon Holt
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Holt
Player
Bor Artnak
72%
(
69 of
96)
1st Serve %
62%
(
71 of
114)
8
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
46 of
71)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
36%
(
35 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
49 of
114)
110
Total Points Won
100
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Holt
Player
Stefan Menichella
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Omar Jasika Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Evgeny Donskoy
Player
Omar Jasika
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
81%
(
58 of
72)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
80%
(
16 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
15 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
22 of
72)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bu Yunchaokete
Player
Omar Jasika
50%
(
18 of
36)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
89%
(
16 of
18)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
19%
(
7 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
56
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Omar Jasika
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
72)
4
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Omar Jasika
Player
Jiaji Wang
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
48%
(
28 of
58)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alexander Ritschard
Player
Omar Jasika
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
87%
(
13 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
55
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Omar Jasika
Player
Bernard Tomic
50%
(
3 of
6)
1st Serve %
40%
(
2 of
5)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
100%
(
3 of
3)
1st Serve Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
1 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Rtn Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
5
Total Points Won
6
|
1-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
Player
Omar Jasika
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
88)
15
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
86
Total Points Won
69
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aidan Mayo
Player
Omar Jasika
57%
(
46 of
81)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
8
Aces
3
10
Double Faults
3
85%
(
39 of
46)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
29 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bernard Tomic
Player
Omar Jasika
44%
(
21 of
48)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
6
90%
(
19 of
21)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vasek Pospisil
Player
Omar Jasika
41%
(
26 of
63)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
10
Aces
0
11
Double Faults
4
92%
(
24 of
26)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Holt Vs Jasika Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
